![]() ![]() If you compile the miner yourself from source you can remove the developer fee altogether, though you might wan to consider leaving the small 1% developer fee at least for a while. You can increase the percentage with a command line parameter if you want to show your support with a higher donation percentage as well. There are also official pre-compiled binaries available for Linux and Windows (32-bit and 64-bit) compiled for CUDA 9.0, though do note that these do come with a 1% dev donation fee included as a means to support the developer. Our initial tests show that the hashrate you get is pretty much the same with very small variation for either of the miners. So if you are worried about closed source miners, you might want to give the nevermore 0.1 miner a try and compile it from the source code yourself. Thank you for reading.There is now a new optimized open-source fork of ccminer with Ravencoin (RVN) X16r support called nevermore miner ( source) that offers better stability compared to the initial ccMiner 2.2.5 with X16r support and similar performance to the closed source ccMiner Enemy 1.03 fork. Moreover, when I run a benchmark, such as with Awesome Miner, it shows a steady 34 or so Mh/s, but I'm assuming their benchmark is just flawed somehow, but that's also confusing!ĭoes anyone have any advice? This is my card from computer upgrade kings. It just seems that everyone reports such a higher hash rate than I've ever received. I bought this card on Amazon, it seemed to have pretty nice reviews, but was I ripped off or something? My system reports it as a 1080 ti, it looks the same as in all of the pictures I've seen. I noticed about 34 or so Mh/s when z-enemy reported a nearly totally easy algorithm, but I can't even fathom 860 Mh/s. ![]() I really do not understand where these review numbers like 33 Mh/s or even your 58 Mh/s for Groestl come from because I NEVER get that. Increasing my power and probably primarily increasing my fan speed maually has resulted in a fairly good boost to my speed and stablity, but it normally hovers around 22-24 Mh/s, whereas before it was more like 15-18. I have tried probably five different miners and I'm now using z-enemy. I'm extremely confused, I have a ZOTAC ZT-P10810F-10P GeForce GTX 1080 Ti AMP Extreme Core Edition 11GB GDDR5X 352-bit to be precise and the highest my hash rate has ever spiked was like 34 Mh/s. Tweaking your overclock settings and seeing a higher hashrate over an hour or day compared to different OC settings the previous hour or day and concluding you've found a better x16r OC setting is even more delusional. however that sequence of 1440 different algo combinations represents an infinitesimal percentage of the possible algo combinations, so you have no idea what your average hashrate will be over the course of the next day, week, month, or even year. You may average your hashrate over that day and think you've found a good approximation of your x16r hashrate. With 1 minute block times you will see about 1440 blocks in a day, so you will see your hash rate for those 1440 different algo combinations. So your hashrate range can theoretically be whatever it is if the block combination is 16 Skeins (the fastest), down to a low against a block of 16 Groestls. The hashrates of the individual algorithms that make up this 16 algo combination - say for a 1080ti - can range from about 860 Mh/s for an easy one, like Skein, down to about 58 Mh/s for a harder one like Groestl. This means there are 16 16 possible "algorithms" for a given block, or 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 possible combinations.Įach of these combinations is going to have it's own hashrate on your system. The "algorithm" for solving a given x16r block is made up of a combination of 16 different algorithms (that can be repeated) chosen from a list of 16 algorithms based on the solution of the previous block. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |